Jesus Sustains All (at the Same Time)

The Bible tells us that Jesus Christ upholds the universe by the word of his power (Hebrews 1:3), and that in him all things hold together (Colossians 1:17).

This means that while Jesus was speaking to first-century denizens of the Middle East about camels and needle eyes, he could have caused Neptune to explode, or a different galaxy to change locations in the universe, or cause a certain bird to eat a certain insect on the plains of the Serengeti (though it probably wasn’t called Serengeti then). Could have…and probably did (well, we don’t think he caused Neptune to explode).

We consider this phenomenal, even impossible. But is it so different from what we do each day in our own bodies? Which of us thinks about making his heart beat, or his lungs expand and contract to draw air and then expel it? Which of us directs cells to collect nutrients from blood, from food, from oxygen? Who thinks about instructing other cells to divide, fight bacteria, or collect and dispose of waste on a microscopic level?

Knowing that, it is not so far out of the realm of imagination that God, while carrying on with man, is carrying on (in a different way) with millions of planets that are circling myriads of stars, which are growing, plateauing and declining.

So, since we don’t consciously control our hearts, our breathing, our circulation, is it too radical, to overwhelming, too humbling to suppose that at this very moment Jesus Christ is making my own heart beat? And yours, too?

How Faith Families Stick Closer than Brothers

According to what they say familiarity breeds contempt.

And I suppose that in most senses they are fairly close with this assessment. The more we get to know someone, the more we see things we didn’t like and at first either didn’t see or didn’t want to see.

But if this truism were really true, then one would expect to see families blowing up all over the place. There are definitely too many dysfunctional families, in which relationships are strained, communication blocked, and occasionally outright hostility manifested in frequent visits by the local police. Yet if it were true to say that familiarity breeds contempt, then shouldn’t all of us be fleeing from one another?

What, then, accounts for the fact that family love and loyalty frequently exists — thrives, even — despite the full awareness of foibles, sin, disobedience and disappointment? What keeps most families out of rampant discord and hostility?

And it isn’t only biological or blended families that defy the truism. Something exists that enables people to overcome interpersonal matters of all sorts that would customarily produce ill will.

Along with increased awareness of the unlovely, in the family we also see more of the lovely. In the family we see the unattractive, but also the attractive; we see sin, but also righteousness; the fall, but also redemption. It is a cause (the cause of Christ that for believers demonstrates that God shows us his glory in part through the brokenness of men) that causes us to revel in the good while not excusing the bad, that develops loyalty in the face of contempt.

For Christians, familiarity with our brothers and sisters frequently does lead to contempt. But real familiarity, familiarity that is more familial in the truest sense of the word, leads past contempt to godly love and loyalty. It is the grace of Christ that enables us to be familial in this sense; to view those who are not necessarily under our roof as nevertheless somehow still in our charge.

6 Things to Look For in Kids’ Bible Curriculum

God places great value on our passing his instruction on to succeeding generations. He told Israel not to forget what they had seen, but to

‘teach them to your children and to their children after them’ (Deuteronomy 4:9).

He required diligence in that instruction:

‘Teach them to your children talking about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. Write them on the door frames of your houses and on your gates’ (Deuteronomy 11:19-20).

And Paul repeats the theme when he tells us

‘Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord’ (Ephesians 6:4).

Yet finding good curriculum for use in our churches is not an easy task.

Tell Us Some Stories!

Recognizing the love kids have for storytelling, those who prepare children’s curriculum for Bible study focus on the narratives of Scripture, which can be especially powerful in conveying God’s redemption story if used properly.

A potential problem with prepared children’s curriculum is that the narratives are not given proper context: they focus on the faith, obedience, or attitude of the human actor in the story; how we should emulate (or not) the various characters; or some other secondary, peripheral or other theme that might not even exist in the text.

The story of Cain and Abel might focus on anger and brotherly love, rather than on obedience to God in worship. Noah and the ark might focus on Noah’s skill in shipbuilding and animal husbandry, but neglect explanation that the flood was God’s judgment on sin. And lessons on events in Jesus’ ministry might emphasize his love and compassion, but omit his demands of righteousness and obedience.

This leaves our children without the whole picture — or with an easily distorted picture — of God, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus and of our need for redemption and God’s gracious provision. The church that desires complete biblical instruction for its children and youth, can look for several things to ensure that its content is complete and biblically sound and that it is faithfully and lovingly conveyed.

1. It must be comprehensive.

Most children’s curriculum repeat the same stories year after year, leaving kids with a stale knowledge of Noah’s Ark but will little understanding of God’s redemption story. By contrast, a two-year plan could easily accommodate teaching the complete Old Testament and New Testament story. Moreover, a plan to teach the basics, with other important materials, by grade six can be very effective. Any good education plan will be intentional about what material will be taught and on what timetable.
2. It must have Godward focus.

Most narrative focus on things other than that for which they were intended. Good curriculum will teach three things about each story: what it says about the condition of man, what it says about the character of God, and how it fits into the overall redemption story. Curriculum that focuses on other themes is in danger of treating God as cosmic magician or entertainer, performing great deeds for our amusement, or of treating stories as life lessons akin to Aesop’s Fables.

3. It must include memorization.

Children have great capacity to learn vast amounts of data, which they will, at some point, be able to assemble into meaningful understanding of redemption and of their own need for salvation.

4. It must include application.

All teaching should aim to affect at least on of the following: belief, attitude or behavior. Much teaching will involve all three. Children and youth should be taught in each lesson that God expects them to be different, in some way, as a result of what he has taught us.

5. It must be challenging.

Teaching for both children and youth must challenge them intellectually and morally. It must not be abbreviated, the difficult subjects adapted for teaching level but not diluted, and the unpleasant topics must not be avoided. If we tell children for more than six years that Jesus says “you are my friend” but they later learn that Jesus actually says “you are my friend if you obey my commandments” we have done them no service, and have created an integrity problem for ourselves. As youth get older and are able to use logic and rhetoric, they no longer will depend solely on narrative but their education should also include didactic instruction.

6. It must be taught.

Teachers must teach. They must believe the word, obey the word, live the word. And learners must learn. They don’t decide what they want to learn about and how it applies. Jesus said to “teach them to observe all that I commanded you,” not what they want to hear or what will make them happy.

Children and youth are capable of much more learning than we typically think. We should be good stewards of the mental and moral instruction and take advantage of the ability to teach them during their formative years. Our teaching should be intentional, it should be planned well, and it should be diligently executed.

A Faircloth by Any Other Name

Not too long ago, we went out to eat at a real, “sit-down” restaurant.

Because we were both a bit tired, we chose not to sit at any of those “stand-up” restaurants that do so poorly that they’ve had to sell all the chairs in order to purchase another batch of soybean for the burgers.out to lunch

Actually, it was a long while ago, so long, in fact, that it was before the last Post Office rate hike and we were still using 34-cent stamps. Oh, my mistake. That was last week.

We went out to eat at one of those restaurants that takes your name and then calls you when your table’s ready. They ask all the important things, such as How many are in your party? Smoking or non-smoking? What’s the limit on your credit card? and Are you really going to bring that toddler in here?

Your response to the last two questions determines whether you sit somewhere suitable to your response to the first two questions, or sit out in the parking lot adjacent the garbage dumpster.

Then the host asked me the name to call when they had set up our folding table in the ally out back.

“Faircloth,” I said.

“Fairclaw?”

“FAIRCLOTH,” I reiterated.

“Fairclauf?”

“FAIR, CLOTH.” I could feel the tips of my ears turning red.

“What?”

“F-A-I-R-C-L-O-T-H,” I said, giving the appropriate cheer leading gesture for each letter, followed by a triple back hand spring into a back flip.

“Oh, Saircloth.”

After catching my breath from the gymnastics and resisting a fleeting urge to put someone in a headlock, I told the host, “‘Jones’ will do.”

This illustrates the constant problem my surname causes in everyday life. When I tell others my name, it undergoes some cloaking maneuver between my mouth and their brain synapses. When others try to read my name, its cloaking device causes them to see things that are not there. In these cases, my name become “Fairchild,” probably because of the celebrity, Morgan Fairchild. I can only speculate as to the things she’s been called.

Once, after purchasing a pair of shoes, I gave the cashier my name and asked him to hold the shoes while I continued to browse. When I came back for them, no one could find my shoes. Oddly enough, everyone on this occasion seemed to understand what my name was, but the original cashier did not. He had left after labeling my shoes “Bearclaw.”

Yes, I am a breakfast pastry. My cousins are Mr. Pop Tart and Mrs. Oat Meal.

It’s difficult to fathom how a name could be so problematic, especially one as simple as mine. Whenever people undergo an epiphany of understanding regarding my name they all exhibit the joy of discovery and exclaim either “Oh, it’s just like it sounds!” or “Oh, it’s just like it’s spelled!” and I get those headlock urges, again.

Faircloth actually means “dweller of fair cliff or hollow” (stop laughing) and our Faircloth forebears have included the wife of a British king and one of the men responsible for printing an edition of the Bible using the famous Gutenberg Press. Our lineage, though not full of presidents, celebrities, or even notorious criminals (although Lauch Faircloth, U.S. Congressman, is a distant relative), is a fairly proud one.

That is, proud until you discover that a relative made it into the Guinness Book of World Records for being named Legal Tender Faircloth.

“Mama, what you reckon we gon’ name this boy?”

“I don’t know, Papa. What’cha got in ya’ pocket?” After examining Papa’s grimy one-dollar bill, Mama pronounced “We’ll name him after the Secretary of the Treasury, Legal Tender.

Mama apparently thought she would be able to carry the child to market and buy some pickled pigs feet with him.

“How ya’ gon’ pay for ’em feet, ma’am?”

“Why, Legal Tender, of course.”

Why couldn’t Papa have had some Lance crackers in his pocket?


 

Rob Faircloth recently received a billed addressed to “Fairsloph.”

Yard Work Not for the Faint at Heart

It begins in March.out to lunch

Otherwise manly men are reduced to humiliated husks of their former selves, sniveling and cowering before the hideous ogre that beats them down in May, makes them whine for mother in July, and by September has them eating quiche and putting the toilet seat down.

It rears its ugly head seeking whom it may devour, and calls itself Yard Work.

Oh, sure, men may say they enjoy working the yard, but that’s only true as long as there are dishes to wash, diapers to change, toilets to clean. Keep in mind that men also say we don’t care which way the toilet paper is put on the roll.

And when a football game is on television, you’d better believe that working in the yard suddenly ranks below listening to John Tesh’s gymnastics commentary (“you’ve got to understand the histrionics of the apparatus”).

Nevertheless, the whole thing is quite brilliant in its conception. Men were able to make Yard Work, a chore as appealing as bedtime stories told by Janet Reno, endurable by devising an entire industry of power tools to use. Anything can be fun if it involves rotating blades powered by a gas motor.

Power trimmers, power edgers weed whackers, chain saws, power blowers, mowers, tillers. You name it — you can probably plug it in or gas it up and use it in the yard.

Were it not for mechanized lawn implements, my yard would resemble a wildlife preserve, and that leaking faucet out back would provide just enough excuse for some federal agency to confiscate the area as an endangered wetland. I can just see Marlin Perkins whipping around in an air boat, describing the habitat while avoiding power poles and the neighbor’s storage shed.

Making use of available yard tools, I’ve devised the Faircloth Method of Lawn Care, which is simple in design but highly dependent upon motorized implements. The equipment necessary to excel in the Faircloth Method are a chainsaw, a riding lawnmower, and several hundred gallons of weed killer.

The Method is as follows:

  1. Whack it down with the chainsaw
  2. Run it over with the mower
  3. Douse it real good with weed killer
  4. Repeat as needed.

My theory is that if it can’t be done with a chainsaw and mower, it’s more suited for the lawn of a music mogul in Malibu Beach.

Unfortunately, though, there are some things even the Faircloth Method won’t remedy. For quite some time, I have believed that kudzu was the cockroach of the plant world, able to survive nuclear holocaust and IRS audits.

Not anymore.

Beating out kudzu for top honors in that category is the awesome wisteria. Your heard right: wisteria. It looks innocent enough, but is actually demon spawn from the pit of Hades.

I disposed of unwanted wisteria vine/plant/tree/bush following the protocol of the Faircloth Method of Lawn Care. It came back.

Perceiving the need for creative pruning, I soaked the glorified weed in gasoline for 48 hours, then set it all on fire. It came back. It went into redeployment mode and came back 20 feet away, then reacquired its base of operations and came back in the center.

I event treated the thing with Aunt Matilda’s bean dip, which is ordinarily potent enough to melt the tiles off the Space Shuttle.

If only Wal-Mart carried napalm in the garden section…

Now, if you’ll excuse me, my quiche is getting cold and I left the toilet seat up.


Rob Faircloth was once trapped in a wisteria vine for three days.

If the Shoe Doesn’t Fit, Lance a Boil

If you put on a pair of shoes and your feet hurt as a result, the problem could be one of two things.

It might be that that shoes are too small or are poorly made. In that case, get different shoes.

But you may experience podiatric pain because the foot is deformed — with bunions, corns, blisters, extra toes. In that case, getting rid of the shoe does not help; the next one will hurt just the same.

The foot must be reformed before any shoe will fit comfortably. This means scraping corns, resetting crooked toes, lancing boils.

This means pain, but ultimately all shoes fit better and the foot is healthier.

Christians AWOL from Spiritual Battle

Like the Spartans, every Christian is born a warrior. It is his destiny to be assaulted, his duty to attack.

Charles Spurgeon

Finally be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes.

Ephesians 6:10-11

How many of us view the Christian life as something dramatically less thrilling that the life of warfare described by Spurgeon, and advocated by Paul? Perhaps we view it as boring, irrelevant, or uninteresting because we are unaware of the implications of our joining Christ’s “battalion.” Do we truly believe that the devil is scheming against us, our families, our churches, or do we treat that aspect of the Christian life as we would Aesop’s Fables or fairy tales? Do we view other believers as our “band of brothers” fighting together to accomplish the goal, or merely as more dues-paying members of the club?

There are many ways in which the Christian may to a great degree forget his military character.

Charles Spurgeon

Most of our conversation on Sunday morning centers around sports or politics. We speak of those matters with a gusto that is strangely absent from our discussions (when we have them) of spiritual matters.

Could it be that all week we have been spoiling for the fight, but released those passions in the only venue we could find? Could it be that we, as Christians, are so unfamiliar with spiritual warfare that we fight our battles vicariously through our favorite teams or preferred candidates? Could it be that we are ignorant of the spiritual battles that occur every week, every day, every moment?

Men of God (and women, to be sure) are warriors, destined for assault and under duty to attack. If we do not perceive those assaults, we attribute them to something else, something less sensational than the “world forces of this darkness.” If we do not attack worldliness, sin and the devil – or at least recognize that we are stumbling around the battlefield – we will have put ourselves in the infirmary with no injury other than sitting on our proverbial helmet.

We will have gone AWOL from the spiritual battle.