American College of Pediatricians Speaks to Gender Identity in Children

The American College of Pediatricians is a good resource from physicians and health care professionals regarding children. In February of this year the ACPeds summarized significant points regarding the discussion about gender identity and preferences in children. I have reprinted the entire statement, which you can also see on the ACPeds website.

Gender Ideology Harms Children

The American College of Pediatricians urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality.

1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sexual differentiation (DSDs), including but not limited to testicular feminization and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.

2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one. No one is born with an awareness of themselves as male or female; this awareness develops over time and, like all developmental processes, may be derailed by a child’s subjective perceptions, relationships, and adverse experiences from infancy forward. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women.

3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V). The psychodynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved.

4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty- blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child.

5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.

6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer.

7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT – affirming countries. What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?

8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

Michelle A. Cretella, M.D.
President of the American College of Pediatricians

Quentin Van Meter, M.D.
Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians
Pediatric Endocrinologist

Paul McHugh, M.D.
University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School and the former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital

Free Speech & Stuff

Suppressing speech with “speech”; good words for speaking; leaving marriage; recognizing genocide…

Free Speech to Suppress Speech

Hecklers and protesters succeeded in shutting down a Donald Trump rally, and adversely affect another.

Some claim that such protests constitute successes for free speech, missing the irony and hypocrisy. Pundits justified the actions in view of Trump’s hateful rhetoric, and some viewed the protesters’ behavior as “civil disobedience.”

Whether you like Trump or not, and regardless of the point your politics occupies on the spectrum, this approach to discourse in the public square — both from Trump and in response to him — should trouble you.

The New Gender Discussion in Schools

This week the Eau Claire Area School District (ECASD) gave preliminary consideration to a policy change to accommodate gender identity in its anti-discrimination policy, and will vote on the policy in April.

This comes as gender identity occupies a prominent place on the statewide stage, though Republican lawmakers failed to pass their measure to require students to use school bathrooms based on birth gender. Nationally, at least one municipality made the news in recent months when it proposed, then withdrew, a policy to make all public municipal restrooms gender-neutral.

Six Aspects of Rehabilitation in Jesus

People generally welcome restoration and rehabilitation: we want to be put back into a former, better position.

Yet sometimes we resist those things that are necessary to achieve the result of restoration. Who enjoys physical therapy after knee replacement? An encounter between Jesus and the apostle Peter demonstrates those things necessary for spiritual rehab.

After boldly predicting that he would lay down his life for Jesus, Peter denied being one of his followers, not once, but three times, when public identification with Jesus seemed most needed. If anyone could use restoration, it was Peter.

RSVPing the King: the Party Animals

Jesus describes party poopers, party animals, and party crashers in his parable in Matthew 22:1-14. These represent the various responses men made to the king’s invitation to the wedding feast for his son.

Party Poopers, rather than enjoying the king and the bounty of his provision, prefer that the attention be focused on their work, their labor, their accomplishments, even if the only attention so focused is their own.

After the Poopers no-showed for the king’s party, he took a different approach and sent his servants to the street corners to bring in everyone they could find, both “good and bad,” and there was apparently no problem in filling the banquet hall with these.

Always up for a good time, willing to party anytime, anywhere, this second group are the Party Animals.

When the Cure is Worse (& Better) than the Disease

Many treatments of the story of Jesus calming the stormy sea (Mark 4 and parallel passages) take the form of inspirational sofa talk: “Jesus will calm the storms of your life.”

What is true about this approach is that believers will have storms. There is no doubt whatsoever that Christ-followers are not exempt from suffering, from trials, from tribulations, and in the already-but-not-yet kingdom of Christ nets still break, illness still strikes and jobs get lost.

In fact, we are told “it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake” (Philippians 1:29).

RSVPing the King: the Party Crashers

If the parable of the wedding feast (Matthew 22:1-14) describes those who refuse the king’s invitation as Party Poopers, then the one who attends but gets kicked out is the Party Crasher.

This guy, like the rest of the Party Animals, was apparently willing to attend the wedding feast at the king’s invitation on short notice, and as the “scabs” of the social order: they were, after all, the king’s second choice.