For Unity, Build for Fireproof Ministry

If farmers with different ideas for what to plant, how to till, and the best fertilizer to use are all charged with cultivated the same field, there will be discord, and probably no crop.

If architects with different blueprints, contrasting styles, and favorite materials all try to build on the same foundation, there will be discord, and either no building at all, one that is hideous, or one that collapses.

Paul uses these images to address the church at Corinth regarding their problems with unity, and divisions over leaders and with leaders. For there to be unity in a congregation, it must be building according to the Lord’s blueprints for ministry. In 1 Corinthians 3:9-17, Paul uses the metaphor of workers and buildings to illustrate his point about unity.

For Church Unity, Ministers answer to God

A fractured congregation is a paralyzed, neutralized congregation.

Many times what fractures the congregation is unbiblical loyalty to particular human ministers on the basis of worldly wisdom: standards of personality, communication, style, community influence, and charisma that are not the minister’s duty or responsibility in Scripture.

Paul addressed just this situation in his first letter to the church at Corinth.

Earnhardt Epitomized Excellence

Let me make a confession. I am not a fan of auto racing.

Before you burn me at the stake as a heretic, make no mistake that I am a genuine southerner in all respects, and have the credentials to prove it:

  • I was born in Alabama
  • I use the term “y’all” and use it correctly

  • I have dressed fish, shot a deer, chewed tobacco (not my favorite, and been called a hick

  • I drive a pickup truck, and

  • I believe that unsweetened tea is a crime against humanity.

But I don’t like car racing.

Identifying with Sports

This is probably because I don’t really identify with any elements of it. My own automotive experience doesn’t include driving around in a circle for three hours at one hundred and eighty. Once, during my first year of college, I drove around Birmingham for two hours because I kept missing my exit. Although I really needed a “pit stop” by the third lap around, this is not quite the same thing.

Why a Public Square Needs the Religious Voice

It is quite fashionable to argue that religious belief has no place in the public square, particularly when the public square houses city councils, school boards, and state houses debating ostensible LGBT(Q) anti-discrimination measures.

Actually, it is usually the unpopular religious belief, or the religious belief with which the public square happens to disagree at the time, that finds no chair at the table. If it serves the public mood or helps pass legislation, religious belief becomes a favored guest. Customarily, though, we are led to believe that society is done a great favor when the religious voice is excluded, when the “fact” realm is kept safe from the “value” realm, when the public square is “naked” and apparently unashamed.

Setting our Sails by Gender Ideology

One hallmark of open and free society is the ability to contribute to the marketplace of ideas, in open forum and reasonable discourse, without fear of reprisals, recriminations, or ridicule.

In certain categories of thought, however, it becomes increasingly difficult to get the proverbial word in, even edgewise.

Across the country school boards, city councils, and state houses are considering the best ways to protect from discrimination students and adults whose experience of gender does not readily coincide with their anatomy or with traditional expectations, those whose sexual identity is, in broad terms, “gender nonconforming.”

American College of Pediatricians Speaks to Gender Identity in Children

The American College of Pediatricians is a good resource from physicians and health care professionals regarding children. In February of this year the ACPeds summarized significant points regarding the discussion about gender identity and preferences in children. I have reprinted the entire statement, which you can also see on the ACPeds website.

Gender Ideology Harms Children

The American College of Pediatricians urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality.

1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sexual differentiation (DSDs), including but not limited to testicular feminization and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.

2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one. No one is born with an awareness of themselves as male or female; this awareness develops over time and, like all developmental processes, may be derailed by a child’s subjective perceptions, relationships, and adverse experiences from infancy forward. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women.

3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V). The psychodynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved.

4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty- blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child.

5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.

6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer.

7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT – affirming countries. What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?

8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

Michelle A. Cretella, M.D.
President of the American College of Pediatricians

Quentin Van Meter, M.D.
Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians
Pediatric Endocrinologist

Paul McHugh, M.D.
University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School and the former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital

The New Gender Discussion in Schools

This week the Eau Claire Area School District (ECASD) gave preliminary consideration to a policy change to accommodate gender identity in its anti-discrimination policy, and will vote on the policy in April.

This comes as gender identity occupies a prominent place on the statewide stage, though Republican lawmakers failed to pass their measure to require students to use school bathrooms based on birth gender. Nationally, at least one municipality made the news in recent months when it proposed, then withdrew, a policy to make all public municipal restrooms gender-neutral.